This section is showing information that is up to date as of the end of the 2023-24 NCAA Basketball season. To join our email list and get notified when we launch the 2024-25 NCAA Basketball section, register for a free account.

Neb Omaha at UCSB: Matchup Stats

Saturday Nov 12, 2016 5:00 pm - Santa Barbara, CA
Odds: UC Santa Barbara by 4.5, Total Points: 158

Matchup Menu: NEOM @ UCSB

More Games From Nov 12, 2016

Neb Omaha vs UCSB Overall

NEOM	Value (rank)	Value (rank)	UCSB
Points/Game	72.3 (#177)	73.3 (#199)	Opp Points/Game
Avg Score Margin	-2.3 (#234)	+0.2 (#177)	Opp Avg Score Margin
Assists/Game	9.9 (#349)	12.4 (#118)	Opp Assists/Game
Total Rebounds/Gm	32.7 (#289)	32.7 (#56)	Opp Total Rebounds/Gm
Assists/FGM	0.398 (#357)	0.459 (#53)	Opp Assists/FGM
Assists/Turnover	1.000 (#232)	1.254 (#267)	Opp Assists/Turnover

UCSB vs Neb Omaha Overall

UCSB	Value (rank)	Value (rank)	NEOM
Points/Game	73.1 (#157)	74.7 (#239)	Opp Points/Game
Avg Score Margin	-0.2 (#177)	+2.3 (#234)	Opp Avg Score Margin
Assists/Game	12.9 (#175)	13.0 (#175)	Opp Assists/Game
Total Rebounds/Gm	34.3 (#207)	34.3 (#151)	Opp Total Rebounds/Gm
Assists/FGM	0.500 (#192)	0.497 (#149)	Opp Assists/FGM
Assists/Turnover	0.974 (#256)	1.204 (#248)	Opp Assists/Turnover

Neb Omaha vs UCSB Shooting

NEOM	Value (rank)	Value (rank)	UCSB
Effective FG %	49.5% (#236)	50.6% (#188)	Opp Effective FG %
FTA/FGA	0.397 (#26)	0.310 (#133)	Opp FTA/FGA
Free Throw %	74.8% (#72)	68.2% (#17)	Opp Free Throw %
Three Point %	31.6% (#295)	32.1% (#72)	Opp Three Point %
Two Point %	50.5% (#165)	51.8% (#244)	Opp Two Point %
Shooting %	44.3% (#172)	45.2% (#241)	Opp Shooting %
Shooting Efficiency	1.086 (#161)	1.069 (#146)	Opp Shooting Efficiency
FGM/Game	24.9 (#230)	27.1 (#276)	Opp FGM/Game
FGA/Game	56.2 (#275)	59.9 (#263)	Opp FGA/Game
3PM/Game	5.9 (#315)	6.5 (#73)	Opp 3PM/Game
3PA/Game	18.6 (#305)	20.2 (#92)	Opp 3PA/Game
FTM/Game	16.7 (#27)	12.7 (#105)	Opp FTM/Game
FTA/Game	22.3 (#41)	18.6 (#160)	Opp FTA/Game

UCSB vs Neb Omaha Shooting

UCSB	Value (rank)	Value (rank)	NEOM
Effective FG %	53.3% (#54)	53.4% (#320)	Opp Effective FG %
FTA/FGA	0.397 (#27)	0.322 (#170)	Opp FTA/FGA
Free Throw %	74.4% (#80)	74.5% (#322)	Opp Free Throw %
Three Point %	35.4% (#93)	35.7% (#300)	Opp Three Point %
Two Point %	53.4% (#60)	53.2% (#305)	Opp Two Point %
Shooting %	47.9% (#20)	45.8% (#278)	Opp Shooting %
Shooting Efficiency	1.142 (#43)	1.130 (#324)	Opp Shooting Efficiency
FGM/Game	25.7 (#167)	26.1 (#209)	Opp FGM/Game
FGA/Game	53.7 (#352)	57.1 (#132)	Opp FGA/Game
3PM/Game	5.8 (#318)	8.7 (#324)	Opp 3PM/Game
3PA/Game	16.3 (#347)	24.2 (#301)	Opp 3PA/Game
FTM/Game	15.9 (#50)	13.7 (#190)	Opp FTM/Game
FTA/Game	21.3 (#73)	18.4 (#151)	Opp FTA/Game

Neb Omaha vs UCSB Scoring

NEOM	Value (rank)	Value (rank)	UCSB
1st Half Pts/Gm	33.2 (#220)	36.3 (#287)	Opp 1st Half Pts/Gm
2nd Half Pts/Gm	38.5 (#135)	36.4 (#99)	Opp 2nd Half Pts/Gm
OT Pts/Gm	0.6 (#186)	0.6 (#160)	Opp OT Pts/Gm

UCSB vs Neb Omaha Scoring

UCSB	Value (rank)	Value (rank)	NEOM
1st Half Pts/Gm	34.5 (#147)	36.5 (#297)	Opp 1st Half Pts/Gm
2nd Half Pts/Gm	38.1 (#164)	37.4 (#154)	Opp 2nd Half Pts/Gm
OT Pts/Gm	0.5 (#205)	0.8 (#214)	Opp OT Pts/Gm

Neb Omaha vs UCSB Rebounding

NEOM	Value (rank)	Value (rank)	UCSB
Off Rebounds/Gm	7.4 (#284)	7.8 (#84)	Opp Off Rebounds/Gm
Def Rebounds/Gm	23.0 (#192)	21.3 (#45)	Opp Def Rebounds/Gm
Off Rebound %	23.1% (#291)	24.3% (#68)	Opp Off Rebound %
Def Rebound %	74.9% (#104)	76.4% (#282)	Opp Def Rebound %

UCSB vs Neb Omaha Rebounding

UCSB	Value (rank)	Value (rank)	NEOM
Off Rebounds/Gm	6.6 (#328)	7.7 (#73)	Opp Off Rebounds/Gm
Def Rebounds/Gm	24.3 (#84)	24.6 (#284)	Opp Def Rebounds/Gm
Off Rebound %	23.6% (#282)	25.1% (#104)	Opp Off Rebound %
Def Rebound %	75.7% (#68)	76.9% (#291)	Opp Def Rebound %

Neb Omaha vs UCSB Blocks

NEOM	Value (rank)	Value (rank)	UCSB
Blocks/Game	2.4 (#315)	2.7 (#38)	Opp Blocks/Game
Block %	4.2% (#309)	4.9% (#74)	Opp Block %

UCSB vs Neb Omaha Blocks

UCSB	Value (rank)	Value (rank)	NEOM
Blocks/Game	3.1 (#200)	2.4 (#14)	Opp Blocks/Game
Block %	5.2% (#218)	4.4% (#23)	Opp Block %

Neb Omaha vs UCSB Steals

NEOM	Value (rank)	Value (rank)	UCSB
Steals/Game	5.8 (#251)	7.1 (#273)	Opp Steals/Game
Steals/Play	7.6% (#235)	9.2% (#303)	Opp Steals/Play

UCSB vs Neb Omaha Steals

UCSB	Value (rank)	Value (rank)	NEOM
Steals/Game	5.0 (#330)	5.2 (#34)	Opp Steals/Game
Steals/Play	6.3% (#328)	6.8% (#35)	Opp Steals/Play

Neb Omaha vs UCSB Turnovers

NEOM	Value (rank)	Value (rank)	UCSB
Turnovers/Game	9.9 (#32)	9.9 (#327)	Opp Turnovers/Game
Turnovers/Play	12.9% (#43)	12.6% (#318)	Opp Turnovers/Play

UCSB vs Neb Omaha Turnovers

UCSB	Value (rank)	Value (rank)	NEOM
Turnovers/Game	13.2 (#308)	10.8 (#265)	Opp Turnovers/Game
Turnovers/Play	17.1% (#326)	14.0% (#242)	Opp Turnovers/Play

Neb Omaha vs UCSB Fouls

NEOM	Value (rank)	Value (rank)	UCSB
Personal Fouls/Gm	16.9 (#172)	17.9 (#99)	Opp Personal Fouls/Gm
Personal Fouls/Play	22.0% (#221)	23.2% (#56)	Opp Personal Fouls/Play

UCSB vs Neb Omaha Fouls

UCSB	Value (rank)	Value (rank)	NEOM
Personal Fouls/Gm	16.8 (#167)	18.3 (#71)	Opp Personal Fouls/Gm
Personal Fouls/Play	21.4% (#175)	23.9% (#25)	Opp Personal Fouls/Play