Sample of our 2015-16 NCAAB betting picks

Our premium NCAAB predictions and picks are driven by computer models that analyze millions of data points.

We use a variety of statistical techniques to predict games, including decision trees, similarity scores, and power ratings.

We publish a game winner, point spread, over/under and money line value pick for all NCAAB games, plus win odds for each pick.

Finally, we provide full transparency with our prediction accuracy reports, which track our historical pick performance.

The picks below represent our most recent opinions based on current betting lines, the results of our computer prediction models, and analysis of other relevant game information. We assign each “TR Pick” an overall confidence rating of 1 to 5 stars. Picks are subject to change until game time based on new information, and we before using this information we strongly encourage all users to read more about our methods:

Day Status TR Pick Opp/Game Confidence Odds Similar Games Decision Tree Power Rating
2/12 Right Princeton at Cornell 82.2% PRNC 72.0% PRNC 72.3% PRNC 72.1%
2/12 Right Columbia vs U Penn 83.1% CMBA 92.3% CMBA 82.8% CMBA 82.9%
2/12 Right St Peters vs Niagara 75.2% STPT 76.0% STPT 72.1% STPT 79.9%
2/12 Right Yale at Dartmouth 81.5% YALE 82.4% YALE 76.8% YALE 84.1%
2/12 Right Harvard vs Brown 72.5% HARV 71.3% HARV 69.1% HARV 73.6%
2/12 Wrong Buffalo vs Ohio 63.6% BUFF 88.2% BUFF 70.0% BUFF 65.9%
2/12 Right Dayton at Rhode Island 54.5% DAY 60.2% DAY 59.3% DAY 59.0%
2/12 Right Arizona St vs USC 52.9% ASU 56.6% ASU 57.4% USC 59.6%
2/12 Right Incarnate Word vs Central Ark 79.1% IW 72.3% IW 76.6% IW 75.9%
2/12 Right Arizona vs UCLA 87.3% ARIZ 79.3% ARIZ 84.0% ARIZ 79.7%
2/12 Right Monmouth at Rider 66.7% MONM 70.1% MONM 66.9% MONM 81.1%
2/12 Right Grand Canyon at Seattle 67.7% GC 50.3% GC 65.2% GC 74.9%