Sample of our 2015-16 NCAAB betting picks

Our premium NCAAB predictions and picks are driven by computer models that analyze millions of data points.

We use a variety of statistical techniques to predict games, including decision trees, similarity scores, and power ratings.

We publish a game winner, point spread, over/under and money line value pick for all NCAAB games, plus win odds for each pick.

Finally, we provide full transparency with our prediction accuracy reports, which track our historical pick performance.

The picks below represent our most recent opinions based on current betting lines, the results of our computer prediction models, and analysis of other relevant game information. We assign each “TR Pick” an overall confidence rating of 1 to 5 stars. Picks are subject to change until game time based on new information, and before using this information we strongly encourage all users to read more about our methods:

Day Status TR Pick Opp/Game Confidence Odds Similar Games Decision Tree Power Rating
2/7 Wrong 859 E Carolina +17.5 at Connecticut 50.8% ECAR 62.1% ECAR 50.9% ECAR +5.8
2/7 Right 876 Marist +9.5 vs Siena 51.9% MRST 54.9% MRST 52.3% MRST +0.8
2/7 Right 863 Miami (FL) -3.0 at GA Tech 52.7% MIFL 53.1% MIFL 53.2% GTEC +0.5
2/7 Right 861 Iowa -9.5 at Illinois 50.5% ILL 59.2% IOWA 50.7% IOWA +0.8
2/7 Right 877 Iona -10.5 at Niagara 50.7% IONA 59.4% IONA 50.8% NIAG +3.5
2/7 Right 867 S Methodist -15.0 at S Florida 50.4% SMU 59.5% SMU 50.5% USF +2.5
2/7 Wrong 866 St Bonavent -13.0 vs Saint Louis 50.5% SBON 50.1% SBON 50.6% STL +1.5
2/7 Right 880 Canisius -1.5 vs Rider 51.0% CAN 58.6% CAN 51.2% CAN +1.0
2/7 Wrong 869 Hofstra +2.0 at James Mad 52.0% JMAD 55.2% HOF 52.4% JMAD +1.1
2/7 Wrong 871 Houston +6.5 at Tulsa 52.5% TULS 52.8% HOU 52.9% HOU +3.2
2/7 Right 882 Fairfield -4.5 vs Manhattan 50.5% MANH 56.7% FAIR 50.6% MANH +1.4
2/7 Right 874 Oregon -6.0 vs Utah 52.6% UTAH 52.7% ORE 53.1% UTAH +0.6