This section is showing information that is up to date as of the end of the 2018-19 NCAA Basketball season. To join our email list and get notified when we launch the 2019-20 NCAA Basketball section, register for a free account.

Chicago St at TX-Pan Am : Matchup Stats

Saturday Feb 18, 2012 8:00 pm - Edinburg, TX
Odds: N/A Total Points: N/A

More Games From Feb 18, 2012

Chicago St vs TX-Pan Am Overall

CHST Value (rank) Value (rank) UTPA
Points/Game 59.9 (#349) 70.7 (#139) Opp Points/Game
Avg Score Margin -25.5 (#353) +0.4 (#185) Opp Avg Score Margin
Assists/Game 11.0 (#312) 13.9 (#245) Opp Assists/Game
Total Rebounds/Gm 30.2 (#344) 38.5 (#317) Opp Total Rebounds/Gm
Assists/FGM 0.509 (#207) 0.580 (#316) Opp Assists/FGM
Assists/Turnover 0.683 (#344) 0.800 (#25) Opp Assists/Turnover

TX-Pan Am vs Chicago St Overall

UTPA Value (rank) Value (rank) CHST
Points/Game 70.2 (#225) 85.4 (#351) Opp Points/Game
Avg Score Margin -0.4 (#185) +25.5 (#353) Opp Avg Score Margin
Assists/Game 13.4 (#157) 16.9 (#346) Opp Assists/Game
Total Rebounds/Gm 32.8 (#285) 38.8 (#325) Opp Total Rebounds/Gm
Assists/FGM 0.560 (#61) 0.557 (#284) Opp Assists/FGM
Assists/Turnover 1.038 (#152) 1.417 (#343) Opp Assists/Turnover

Chicago St vs TX-Pan Am Shooting

CHST Value (rank) Value (rank) UTPA
Effective FG % 44.1% (#346) 50.4% (#159) Opp Effective FG %
FTA/FGA 0.332 (#181) 0.435 (#344) Opp FTA/FGA
Free Throw % 68.5% (#256) 69.0% (#82) Opp Free Throw %
Three Point % 30.6% (#331) 33.8% (#140) Opp Three Point %
Two Point % 43.5% (#347) 50.3% (#179) Opp Two Point %
Shooting % 40.0% (#336) 44.6% (#198) Opp Shooting %
Shooting Efficiency 0.954 (#348) 1.078 (#167) Opp Shooting Efficiency
FGM/Game 21.6 (#344) 24.1 (#86) Opp FGM/Game
FGA/Game 53.9 (#324) 54.0 (#51) Opp FGA/Game
3PM/Game 4.5 (#352) 6.3 (#30) Opp 3PM/Game
3PA/Game 14.6 (#352) 18.7 (#20) Opp 3PA/Game
FTM/Game 12.3 (#253) 16.2 (#325) Opp FTM/Game
FTA/Game 17.9 (#236) 23.5 (#337) Opp FTA/Game

TX-Pan Am vs Chicago St Shooting

UTPA Value (rank) Value (rank) CHST
Effective FG % 46.3% (#328) 57.7% (#352) Opp Effective FG %
FTA/FGA 0.427 (#7) 0.337 (#209) Opp FTA/FGA
Free Throw % 69.6% (#214) 69.6% (#112) Opp Free Throw %
Three Point % 31.3% (#308) 38.4% (#337) Opp Three Point %
Two Point % 46.0% (#320) 57.8% (#351) Opp Two Point %
Shooting % 41.6% (#297) 49.3% (#350) Opp Shooting %
Shooting Efficiency 1.023 (#302) 1.203 (#352) Opp Shooting Efficiency
FGM/Game 23.9 (#271) 30.3 (#350) Opp FGM/Game
FGA/Game 57.4 (#183) 61.4 (#315) Opp FGA/Game
3PM/Game 5.3 (#341) 10.3 (#349) Opp 3PM/Game
3PA/Game 17.1 (#339) 26.9 (#342) Opp 3PA/Game
FTM/Game 17.1 (#14) 14.4 (#254) Opp FTM/Game
FTA/Game 24.5 (#8) 20.7 (#273) Opp FTA/Game

Chicago St vs TX-Pan Am Scoring

CHST Value (rank) Value (rank) UTPA
1st Half Pts/Gm 26.6 (#349) 33.9 (#199) Opp 1st Half Pts/Gm
2nd Half Pts/Gm 33.3 (#334) 36.2 (#104) Opp 2nd Half Pts/Gm
OT Pts/Gm -- (#301) 0.6 (#155) Opp OT Pts/Gm

TX-Pan Am vs Chicago St Scoring

UTPA Value (rank) Value (rank) CHST
1st Half Pts/Gm 31.0 (#285) 41.1 (#351) Opp 1st Half Pts/Gm
2nd Half Pts/Gm 38.6 (#119) 44.2 (#352) Opp 2nd Half Pts/Gm
OT Pts/Gm 0.6 (#180) -- (#1) Opp OT Pts/Gm

Chicago St vs TX-Pan Am Rebounding

CHST Value (rank) Value (rank) UTPA
Off Rebounds/Gm 6.0 (#339) 9.2 (#269) Opp Off Rebounds/Gm
Def Rebounds/Gm 20.7 (#333) 25.4 (#301) Opp Def Rebounds/Gm
Off Rebound % 19.0% (#340) 30.2% (#302) Opp Off Rebound %
Def Rebound % 67.2% (#342) 76.4% (#256) Opp Def Rebound %

TX-Pan Am vs Chicago St Rebounding

UTPA Value (rank) Value (rank) CHST
Off Rebounds/Gm 7.9 (#224) 10.1 (#321) Opp Off Rebounds/Gm
Def Rebounds/Gm 21.3 (#308) 25.7 (#308) Opp Def Rebounds/Gm
Off Rebound % 23.6% (#256) 32.8% (#342) Opp Off Rebound %
Def Rebound % 69.8% (#302) 81.0% (#340) Opp Def Rebound %

Chicago St vs TX-Pan Am Blocks

CHST Value (rank) Value (rank) UTPA
Blocks/Game 2.0 (#323) 3.6 (#256) Opp Blocks/Game
Block % 3.3% (#327) 6.3% (#263) Opp Block %

TX-Pan Am vs Chicago St Blocks

UTPA Value (rank) Value (rank) CHST
Blocks/Game 2.9 (#222) 3.2 (#149) Opp Blocks/Game
Block % 5.3% (#202) 5.9% (#204) Opp Block %

Chicago St vs TX-Pan Am Steals

CHST Value (rank) Value (rank) UTPA
Steals/Game 5.8 (#219) 6.1 (#162) Opp Steals/Game
Steals/Play 7.0% (#245) 7.4% (#129) Opp Steals/Play

TX-Pan Am vs Chicago St Steals

UTPA Value (rank) Value (rank) CHST
Steals/Game 9.3 (#3) 7.5 (#333) Opp Steals/Game
Steals/Play 11.2% (#3) 9.6% (#340) Opp Steals/Play

Chicago St vs TX-Pan Am Turnovers

CHST Value (rank) Value (rank) UTPA
Turnovers/Game 16.1 (#344) 17.4 (#4) Opp Turnovers/Game
Turnovers/Play 20.4% (#345) 21.0% (#3) Opp Turnovers/Play

TX-Pan Am vs Chicago St Turnovers

UTPA Value (rank) Value (rank) CHST
Turnovers/Game 12.9 (#172) 11.9 (#269) Opp Turnovers/Game
Turnovers/Play 15.8% (#143) 14.4% (#298) Opp Turnovers/Play

Chicago St vs TX-Pan Am Fouls

CHST Value (rank) Value (rank) UTPA
Personal Fouls/Gm 19.8 (#311) 22.1 (#3) Opp Personal Fouls/Gm
Personal Fouls/Play 23.9% (#275) 27.0% (#2) Opp Personal Fouls/Play

TX-Pan Am vs Chicago St Fouls

UTPA Value (rank) Value (rank) CHST
Personal Fouls/Gm 20.8 (#339) 17.9 (#170) Opp Personal Fouls/Gm
Personal Fouls/Play 25.1% (#321) 22.7% (#151) Opp Personal Fouls/Play