This section is showing information that is up to date as of the end of the 2015-2016 NCAA BB season. To join our email list and get notified when we launch the 2016-2017 NCAA BB section, register for a free account.

Chicago St at TX-Pan Am : Matchup Stats

Saturday Feb 18, 2012 8:00 pm - Edinburg, TX
Odds: N/A Total Points: N/A

More Games From Feb 18, 2012

Chicago St vs TX-Pan Am Overall

CHST Value (rank) Value (rank) UTPA
Points/Game 62.7 (#339) 78.4 (#307) Opp Points/Game
Avg Score Margin -16.1 (#351) +13.6 (#345) Opp Avg Score Margin
Assists/Game 10.6 (#327) 16.5 (#337) Opp Assists/Game
Total Rebounds/Gm 35.1 (#206) 41.4 (#342) Opp Total Rebounds/Gm
Assists/FGM 0.479 (#271) 0.563 (#277) Opp Assists/FGM
Assists/Turnover 0.742 (#337) 1.679 (#349) Opp Assists/Turnover

TX-Pan Am vs Chicago St Overall

UTPA Value (rank) Value (rank) CHST
Points/Game 64.8 (#323) 78.8 (#311) Opp Points/Game
Avg Score Margin -13.6 (#345) +16.1 (#351) Opp Avg Score Margin
Assists/Game 14.7 (#72) 17.6 (#346) Opp Assists/Game
Total Rebounds/Gm 32.3 (#310) 40.6 (#335) Opp Total Rebounds/Gm
Assists/FGM 0.632 (#11) 0.673 (#350) Opp Assists/FGM
Assists/Turnover 1.222 (#74) 1.314 (#324) Opp Assists/Turnover

Chicago St vs TX-Pan Am Shooting

CHST Value (rank) Value (rank) UTPA
Effective FG % 42.6% (#349) 52.1% (#285) Opp Effective FG %
FTA/FGA 0.281 (#340) 0.311 (#59) Opp FTA/FGA
Free Throw % 66.1% (#307) 67.5% (#55) Opp Free Throw %
Three Point % 30.1% (#333) 35.0% (#190) Opp Three Point %
Two Point % 40.9% (#348) 51.9% (#294) Opp Two Point %
Shooting % 36.7% (#351) 46.7% (#316) Opp Shooting %
Shooting Efficiency 0.921 (#349) 1.097 (#254) Opp Shooting Efficiency
FGM/Game 22.2 (#333) 29.3 (#342) Opp FGM/Game
FGA/Game 60.4 (#54) 62.7 (#330) Opp FGA/Game
3PM/Game 7.1 (#167) 6.7 (#111) Opp 3PM/Game
3PA/Game 23.5 (#54) 19.1 (#104) Opp 3PA/Game
FTM/Game 11.2 (#338) 13.1 (#72) Opp FTM/Game
FTA/Game 17.0 (#332) 19.5 (#92) Opp FTA/Game

TX-Pan Am vs Chicago St Shooting

UTPA Value (rank) Value (rank) CHST
Effective FG % 47.2% (#286) 54.5% (#338) Opp Effective FG %
FTA/FGA 0.296 (#331) 0.436 (#310) Opp FTA/FGA
Free Throw % 67.2% (#280) 68.7% (#105) Opp Free Throw %
Three Point % 33.1% (#248) 38.7% (#339) Opp Three Point %
Two Point % 45.7% (#283) 51.8% (#292) Opp Two Point %
Shooting % 41.0% (#292) 46.1% (#293) Opp Shooting %
Shooting Efficiency 0.995 (#316) 1.144 (#333) Opp Shooting Efficiency
FGM/Game 23.3 (#291) 26.1 (#243) Opp FGM/Game
FGA/Game 56.7 (#220) 56.7 (#134) Opp FGA/Game
3PM/Game 7.0 (#174) 9.6 (#349) Opp 3PM/Game
3PA/Game 21.1 (#139) 24.7 (#342) Opp 3PA/Game
FTM/Game 11.3 (#336) 17.0 (#299) Opp FTM/Game
FTA/Game 16.8 (#334) 24.7 (#316) Opp FTA/Game

Chicago St vs TX-Pan Am Scoring

CHST Value (rank) Value (rank) UTPA
1st Half Pts/Gm 29.3 (#321) 38.2 (#333) Opp 1st Half Pts/Gm
2nd Half Pts/Gm 33.3 (#336) 40.2 (#276) Opp 2nd Half Pts/Gm
OT Pts/Gm -- (#305) -- (#1) Opp OT Pts/Gm

TX-Pan Am vs Chicago St Scoring

UTPA Value (rank) Value (rank) CHST
1st Half Pts/Gm 30.0 (#311) 37.8 (#325) Opp 1st Half Pts/Gm
2nd Half Pts/Gm 34.8 (#303) 41.0 (#303) Opp 2nd Half Pts/Gm
OT Pts/Gm -- (#305) -- (#1) Opp OT Pts/Gm

Chicago St vs TX-Pan Am Rebounding

CHST Value (rank) Value (rank) UTPA
Off Rebounds/Gm 10.1 (#77) 11.6 (#345) Opp Off Rebounds/Gm
Def Rebounds/Gm 21.4 (#311) 26.4 (#326) Opp Def Rebounds/Gm
Off Rebound % 27.3% (#188) 34.4% (#342) Opp Off Rebound %
Def Rebound % 68.1% (#315) 78.0% (#319) Opp Def Rebound %

TX-Pan Am vs Chicago St Rebounding

UTPA Value (rank) Value (rank) CHST
Off Rebounds/Gm 7.4 (#303) 10.0 (#274) Opp Off Rebounds/Gm
Def Rebounds/Gm 22.1 (#275) 27.0 (#337) Opp Def Rebounds/Gm
Off Rebound % 22.0% (#319) 31.9% (#315) Opp Off Rebound %
Def Rebound % 65.6% (#342) 72.7% (#188) Opp Def Rebound %

Chicago St vs TX-Pan Am Blocks

CHST Value (rank) Value (rank) UTPA
Blocks/Game 2.9 (#233) 2.5 (#14) Opp Blocks/Game
Block % 5.0% (#224) 4.4% (#16) Opp Block %

TX-Pan Am vs Chicago St Blocks

UTPA Value (rank) Value (rank) CHST
Blocks/Game 2.9 (#223) 4.4 (#329) Opp Blocks/Game
Block % 4.7% (#260) 7.2% (#314) Opp Block %

Chicago St vs TX-Pan Am Steals

CHST Value (rank) Value (rank) UTPA
Steals/Game 6.6 (#95) 6.5 (#262) Opp Steals/Game
Steals/Play 8.0% (#103) 8.4% (#293) Opp Steals/Play

TX-Pan Am vs Chicago St Steals

UTPA Value (rank) Value (rank) CHST
Steals/Game 4.7 (#312) 6.8 (#293) Opp Steals/Game
Steals/Play 5.8% (#314) 8.3% (#276) Opp Steals/Play

Chicago St vs TX-Pan Am Turnovers

CHST Value (rank) Value (rank) UTPA
Turnovers/Game 14.3 (#311) 9.8 (#338) Opp Turnovers/Game
Turnovers/Play 17.4% (#298) 12.1% (#345) Opp Turnovers/Play

TX-Pan Am vs Chicago St Turnovers

UTPA Value (rank) Value (rank) CHST
Turnovers/Game 12.0 (#115) 13.4 (#103) Opp Turnovers/Game
Turnovers/Play 15.6% (#168) 16.3% (#125) Opp Turnovers/Play

Chicago St vs TX-Pan Am Fouls

CHST Value (rank) Value (rank) UTPA
Personal Fouls/Gm 21.7 (#323) 16.6 (#338) Opp Personal Fouls/Gm
Personal Fouls/Play 26.4% (#304) 21.5% (#327) Opp Personal Fouls/Play

TX-Pan Am vs Chicago St Fouls

UTPA Value (rank) Value (rank) CHST
Personal Fouls/Gm 17.9 (#75) 17.0 (#328) Opp Personal Fouls/Gm
Personal Fouls/Play 22.0% (#52) 20.6% (#347) Opp Personal Fouls/Play