September 25, 2015 - by Seth Trachtman
Heading into our fourth weekend of 2015 college football, here’s how things generally stand in our rankings.
First, to clarify, when we refer to the TR rankings, we mean our college football predictive ratings, which are our core measure of team strength. These rankings are designed, as the name implies, to predict future outcomes of games. They are driven by margins of victory, and unlike human voters, they don’t care about wins and losses, which can be highly influenced by luck (e.g. a poorly timed fumble). Which means:
In addition, our latest rankings factor in a blend of season performance to date plus each team’s preseason rating, since the results of a small number of early season games can often be misleading. However, the impact of the preseason rating (which you can find in our 2015 preseason college football rankings post) decays as the season goes on.
Team | Rating | Change | New Rank | Old Rank | Result |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Middle Tenn | 6.4 | +5.8 | 40 | 65 | W 73-14 vs. #113 Charlotte |
Oklahoma St | 12.0 | +5.5 | 23 | 41 | W 69-14 vs. #109 TX-San Ant |
Connecticut | -13.8 | +4.9 | 110 | 118 | L 9-6 @ #36 Missouri |
S Alabama | -15.7 | +4.6 | 113 | 123 | W 34-27 @ #75 San Diego St |
N Carolina | 10.4 | +4.6 | 30 | 42 | W 48-14 vs. #44 Illinois |
N Illinois | 1.0 | +4.4 | 62 | 74 | L 20-13 @ #2 Ohio State |
Stanford | 15.3 | +3.9 | 14 | 23 | W 41-31 @ #4 USC |
U Mass | -14.9 | +3.9 | 112 | 119 | L 25-23 vs. #23 Temple |
Buffalo | -5.7 | +3.6 | 84 | 101 | W 33-15 @ #103 Fla Atlantic |
Northwestern | 8.4 | +3.5 | 36 | 48 | W 19-10 @ #32 Duke |
Team | Rating | Change | New Rank | Old Rank | Result |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Charlotte | -22.9 | -6.1 | 126 | 113 | L 73-14 @ #65 Middle Tenn |
Minnesota | 2.1 | -4.8 | 58 | 40 | W 10-7 vs. #112 Kent State |
San Diego St | -7.9 | -4.5 | 94 | 75 | L 34-27 vs. #123 S Alabama |
Illinois | 1.4 | -4.3 | 60 | 44 | L 48-14 @ # 42 N Carolina |
TX-San Ant | -18.2 | -4.2 | 118 | 109 | L 69-14 vs. #41 Oklahoma St |
Virginia | -2.8 | -4.0 | 72 | 62 | W 35-29 vs. William & Mary |
TX Christian | 18.1 | -3.9 | 10 | 5 | W 56-37 vs. #106 SMU |
USC | 19.6 | -3.5 | 6 | 4 | L 41-31 vs. #23 Stanford |
Missouri | 4.5 | -3.5 | 48 | 36 | W 9-6 vs. #118 Connecticut |
Central FL | -8.6 | -3.5 | 97 | 84 | L 16-15 vs. Furman |
The SEC is well represented in the teams we like better than AP. As mentioned in our preseason rankings post, humans are less likely than computers to believe that a really tough conference can have lots of teams, including teams with one or multiple losses, that are still Top 25 worthy.
There are also several teams that lost this past Saturday, such as Alabama, Georgia Tech, and USC, on the list of teams we like better than the AP. Human voters are more apt to react negatively to a loss — even if it was against a very strong team, or by less than expected — than objective ratings are.
Team | TR Rank | AP Rank | TR Change | AP Change | Predictive | Result | SOS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mississippi (3-0) | 1 | 3 | +2 | +12 | 25.4 | W 43-37 @. #1 Alabama | 11.4 |
Alabama (2-1) | 2 | 12 | -1 | -10 | 24.8 | L 43-37 vs. #3 Mississippi | 13.7 |
Ohio State (3-0) | 3 | 1 | -1 | 22.4 | W 20-13 vs. #74 N Illinois | 4.2 | |
Georgia (3-0) | 4 | 7 | +3 | 21.9 | W 52-20 vs. #46 S Carolina | 9.3 | |
GA Tech (2-1) | 5 | 20 | +1 | -6 | 20.3 | L 30-22 @ #8 Notre Dame | 10.5 |
USC (2-1) | 6 | 19 | -2 | -13 | 19.6 | L 41-31 vs. #23 Stanford | 9.2 |
Notre Dame (3-0) | 7 | 6 | +1 | +2 | 19.1 | W 30-22 vs. #6 GA Tech | 8.5 |
LSU (2-0) | 8 | 8 | +5 | +5 | 18.9 | W 45-21 vs. #37 Auburn | 11.2 |
Baylor (2-0) | 9 | 5 | +1 | 18.3 | DNP | 7.2 | |
TX Christian (3-0) | 10 | 3 | -5 | 18.1 | W 56-37 vs. #106 S Methodist | 8.1 | |
Oklahoma (3-0) | 11 | 15 | -2 | +1 | 16.8 | W 52-38 vs. #77 Tulsa | 8.6 |
Florida St (3-0) | 12 | 10 | +3 | -1 | 15.9 | W 14-0 @ #47 Boston Col | 5.7 |
Texas A&M (3-0) | 13 | 14 | -2 | +3 | 15.6 | W 44-27 vs. #104 Nevada | 8.5 |
Stanford (2-1) | 14 | 21 | +9 | 15.3 | W 41-31 @ #4 USC | 7.6 | |
Wisconsin (2-1) | 15 | 22 | -3 | +2 | 15.2 | W 28-3 vs. #114 Troy | 3.3 |
UCLA (3-0) | 16 | 9 | -2 | +1 | 14.5 | W 24-23 vs. #26 BYU | 6.9 |
Clemson (3-0) | 17 | 11 | -1 | 14.4 | W 20-17 @ #56 Louisville | 6.8 | |
W Virginia (2-0) | 18 | NR | -1 | 14.1 | DNP | 6.8 | |
Michigan St (3-0) | 19 | 2 | 0 | +2 | 13.7 | W 35-21 vs. #53 Air Force | 4.2 |
Miss State (2-1) | 20 | NR | 0 | 13.7 | W 62-13 vs. Northwestern St | 8.7 | |
Tennessee (2-1) | 21 | NR | -3 | 13.4 | W 55-10 vs. W Carolina | 7.1 | |
BYU (2-1) | 22 | 22 | +4 | -3 | 12.0 | L 24-23 @ #14 UCLA | 2.5 |
Oklahoma St (3-0) | 23 | 24 | +18 | +1 | 12.0 | W 69-14 vs. #109 TX-San Ant | 6.0 |
VA Tech (2-1) | 24 | NR | +9 | 11.6 | W 51-24 @ #83 Purdue | 5.8 | |
Arizona (3-0) | 25 | 16 | +9 | +4 | 11.0 | W 77-13 vs. N Arizona | 4.6 |
As a basic measure of conference strength, we can average the predictive ratings of every team in a conference. Here’s how the conferences compare after Week 3.
Conference | Avg. Rating |
---|---|
SEC | 12.1 |
Big 12 | 7.8 |
Pac-12 | 7.2 |
ACC | 6.8 |
Big Ten | 4.7 |
AAC | -4.7 |
Mountain West | -7.7 |
MAC | -8.8 |
CUSA | -8.9 |
Sun Belt | -12.3 |
The SEC remains the clear leader. With their win over Alabama on Saturday, Ole Miss is now the front runner to win the conference (42% odds), while Georgia has the second highest probability (30%).
Other teams with the highest odds to win their conference right now are Baylor (Big 12), Stanford (Pac-12), Georgia Tech (ACC), Ohio State (Big Ten), Temple (AAC), Boise State (Mountain West), Toledo (MAC), Middle Tennessee (CUSA), and Georgia Southern (Sun Belt).
Some of those races are really close, though. You can see all the latest conference winner odds, updated daily, on our college football projected standings page.
Printed from TeamRankings.com - © 2005-2024 Team Rankings, LLC. All Rights Reserved.