Chicago St vs TX-Pan Am Overall
| CHST Offense |
Value (rank) |
Value (rank) |
UTPA Defense |
| Points/Game |
62.9 (#266) |
68.2 (#202) |
Opp Points/Game |
| Avg Score Margin |
-6.9 (#294) |
+5.2 (#266) |
Opp Avg Score Margin |
| Assists/Game |
11.7 (#238) |
12.7 (#176) |
Opp Assists/Game |
| Total Rebounds/Gm |
33.2 (#231) |
37.8 (#314) |
Opp Total Rebounds/Gm |
| Assists/FGM |
0.513 (#222) |
0.509 (#96) |
Opp Assists/FGM |
| Assists/Turnover |
0.799 (#273) |
0.857 (#101) |
Opp Assists/Turnover |
|
TX-Pan Am vs Chicago St Overall
| UTPA Offense |
Value (rank) |
Value (rank) |
CHST Defense |
| Points/Game |
63.0 (#263) |
69.8 (#248) |
Opp Points/Game |
| Avg Score Margin |
-5.2 (#266) |
+6.9 (#294) |
Opp Avg Score Margin |
| Assists/Game |
11.8 (#223) |
13.3 (#219) |
Opp Assists/Game |
| Total Rebounds/Gm |
31.2 (#313) |
37.6 (#308) |
Opp Total Rebounds/Gm |
| Assists/FGM |
0.539 (#158) |
0.580 (#284) |
Opp Assists/FGM |
| Assists/Turnover |
0.842 (#246) |
0.819 (#68) |
Opp Assists/Turnover |
|
Chicago St vs TX-Pan Am Shooting
| CHST Offense |
Value (rank) |
Value (rank) |
UTPA Defense |
| Effective FG % |
44.4% (#319) |
49.5% (#207) |
Opp Effective FG % |
| FTA/FGA |
0.246 (#345) |
0.359 (#171) |
Opp FTA/FGA |
| Free Throw % |
73.1% (#59) |
67.0% (#53) |
Opp Free Throw % |
| Three Point % |
32.6% (#234) |
34.8% (#224) |
Opp Three Point % |
| Two Point % |
41.9% (#333) |
48.6% (#211) |
Opp Two Point % |
| Shooting % |
38.6% (#329) |
45.0% (#263) |
Opp Shooting % |
| Shooting Efficiency |
0.957 (#317) |
1.056 (#201) |
Opp Shooting Efficiency |
| FGM/Game |
22.7 (#224) |
24.9 (#252) |
Opp FGM/Game |
| FGA/Game |
58.9 (#29) |
55.4 (#198) |
Opp FGA/Game |
| 3PM/Game |
6.9 (#94) |
5.0 (#36) |
Opp 3PM/Game |
| 3PA/Game |
21.1 (#52) |
14.4 (#22) |
Opp 3PA/Game |
| FTM/Game |
10.6 (#328) |
13.3 (#146) |
Opp FTM/Game |
| FTA/Game |
14.5 (#340) |
19.9 (#194) |
Opp FTA/Game |
|
TX-Pan Am vs Chicago St Shooting
| UTPA Offense |
Value (rank) |
Value (rank) |
CHST Defense |
| Effective FG % |
47.4% (#232) |
50.5% (#247) |
Opp Effective FG % |
| FTA/FGA |
0.394 (#83) |
0.481 (#340) |
Opp FTA/FGA |
| Free Throw % |
63.6% (#320) |
70.6% (#243) |
Opp Free Throw % |
| Three Point % |
34.9% (#118) |
36.0% (#276) |
Opp Three Point % |
| Two Point % |
44.9% (#280) |
48.6% (#213) |
Opp Two Point % |
| Shooting % |
41.5% (#243) |
44.3% (#230) |
Opp Shooting % |
| Shooting Efficiency |
1.004 (#265) |
1.097 (#281) |
Opp Shooting Efficiency |
| FGM/Game |
21.9 (#278) |
22.9 (#133) |
Opp FGM/Game |
| FGA/Game |
52.6 (#255) |
51.7 (#68) |
Opp FGA/Game |
| 3PM/Game |
6.1 (#162) |
6.4 (#215) |
Opp 3PM/Game |
| 3PA/Game |
17.5 (#190) |
17.8 (#154) |
Opp 3PA/Game |
| FTM/Game |
13.2 (#198) |
17.6 (#338) |
Opp FTM/Game |
| FTA/Game |
20.7 (#117) |
24.9 (#337) |
Opp FTA/Game |
|
Chicago St vs TX-Pan Am Scoring
| CHST Offense |
Value (rank) |
Value (rank) |
UTPA Defense |
| 1st Half Pts/Gm |
29.0 (#258) |
30.7 (#173) |
Opp 1st Half Pts/Gm |
| 2nd Half Pts/Gm |
32.6 (#290) |
35.3 (#167) |
Opp 2nd Half Pts/Gm |
| OT Pts/Gm |
1.2 (#55) |
2.2 (#341) |
Opp OT Pts/Gm |
|
TX-Pan Am vs Chicago St Scoring
| UTPA Offense |
Value (rank) |
Value (rank) |
CHST Defense |
| 1st Half Pts/Gm |
26.2 (#328) |
32.6 (#253) |
Opp 1st Half Pts/Gm |
| 2nd Half Pts/Gm |
34.4 (#225) |
35.5 (#178) |
Opp 2nd Half Pts/Gm |
| OT Pts/Gm |
2.4 (#4) |
1.6 (#322) |
Opp OT Pts/Gm |
|
Chicago St vs TX-Pan Am Rebounding
| CHST Offense |
Value (rank) |
Value (rank) |
UTPA Defense |
| Off Rebounds/Gm |
9.8 (#139) |
10.7 (#304) |
Opp Off Rebounds/Gm |
| Def Rebounds/Gm |
20.0 (#290) |
24.1 (#307) |
Opp Def Rebounds/Gm |
| Off Rebound % |
28.4% (#224) |
35.0% (#324) |
Opp Off Rebound % |
| Def Rebound % |
68.2% (#237) |
74.9% (#306) |
Opp Def Rebound % |
|
TX-Pan Am vs Chicago St Rebounding
| UTPA Offense |
Value (rank) |
Value (rank) |
CHST Defense |
| Off Rebounds/Gm |
8.1 (#277) |
9.3 (#157) |
Opp Off Rebounds/Gm |
| Def Rebounds/Gm |
19.9 (#297) |
24.8 (#330) |
Opp Def Rebounds/Gm |
| Off Rebound % |
25.1% (#306) |
31.8% (#237) |
Opp Off Rebound % |
| Def Rebound % |
65.0% (#324) |
71.6% (#224) |
Opp Def Rebound % |
|
Chicago St vs TX-Pan Am Blocks
| CHST Offense |
Value (rank) |
Value (rank) |
UTPA Defense |
| Blocks/Game |
2.8 (#231) |
2.6 (#24) |
Opp Blocks/Game |
| Block % |
5.4% (#221) |
4.9% (#29) |
Opp Block % |
|
TX-Pan Am vs Chicago St Blocks
| UTPA Offense |
Value (rank) |
Value (rank) |
CHST Defense |
| Blocks/Game |
2.0 (#317) |
3.4 (#187) |
Opp Blocks/Game |
| Block % |
3.6% (#323) |
5.9% (#131) |
Opp Block % |
|
Chicago St vs TX-Pan Am Steals
| CHST Offense |
Value (rank) |
Value (rank) |
UTPA Defense |
| Steals/Game |
9.3 (#6) |
7.2 (#253) |
Opp Steals/Game |
| Steals/Play |
11.6% (#9) |
9.4% (#262) |
Opp Steals/Play |
|
TX-Pan Am vs Chicago St Steals
| UTPA Offense |
Value (rank) |
Value (rank) |
CHST Defense |
| Steals/Game |
6.4 (#200) |
7.0 (#232) |
Opp Steals/Game |
| Steals/Play |
8.0% (#213) |
8.7% (#201) |
Opp Steals/Play |
|
Chicago St vs TX-Pan Am Turnovers
| CHST Offense |
Value (rank) |
Value (rank) |
UTPA Defense |
| Turnovers/Game |
14.6 (#269) |
14.8 (#64) |
Opp Turnovers/Game |
| Turnovers/Play |
18.2% (#240) |
18.6% (#72) |
Opp Turnovers/Play |
|
TX-Pan Am vs Chicago St Turnovers
| UTPA Offense |
Value (rank) |
Value (rank) |
CHST Defense |
| Turnovers/Game |
14.0 (#225) |
16.2 (#17) |
Opp Turnovers/Game |
| Turnovers/Play |
18.2% (#248) |
20.3% (#22) |
Opp Turnovers/Play |
|
Chicago St vs TX-Pan Am Fouls
| CHST Offense |
Value (rank) |
Value (rank) |
UTPA Defense |
| Personal Fouls/Gm |
20.9 (#337) |
19.2 (#53) |
Opp Personal Fouls/Gm |
| Personal Fouls/Play |
26.2% (#328) |
25.0% (#41) |
Opp Personal Fouls/Play |
|
TX-Pan Am vs Chicago St Fouls
| UTPA Offense |
Value (rank) |
Value (rank) |
CHST Defense |
| Personal Fouls/Gm |
17.8 (#194) |
14.5 (#343) |
Opp Personal Fouls/Gm |
| Personal Fouls/Play |
22.5% (#142) |
18.1% (#347) |
Opp Personal Fouls/Play |
|
