• Login
  • Subscribe Now For Picks
TeamRankings
Follow @teamrankings
  • Home
  • NBA Playoffs 2013
  • NBA
    • Home
    • NBA Forum
    • Game Predictions
    • Season Projections
    • Game Winner Picks
    • Point Spread Picks
    • Over/Under Picks
    • Prediction Accuracy
    • Rankings
    • Stats
    • Scores
    • Odds
    • Trends
    • Standings
    • Schedules
  • MLB
    • Home
    • MLB Forum
    • Game Predictions
    • Season Projections
    • Game Winner Picks
    • Money Line Picks
    • Over/Under Picks
    • Prediction Accuracy
    • Rankings
    • Stats
    • Scores
    • Odds
    • Trends
    • Standings
    • Schedules
  • NFL
    • Home
    • NFL Forum
    • Game Predictions
    • Season Projections
    • Game Winner Picks
    • Point Spread Picks
    • Over/Under Picks
    • Office Pool Picks
    • Prediction Accuracy
    • Rankings
    • Stats
    • Scores
    • Odds
    • Trends
    • Standings
    • Schedules
  • NCAAF
    • Home
    • NCAAF Forum
    • Game Predictions
    • Season Projections
    • Game Winner Picks
    • Point Spread Picks
    • Over/Under Picks
    • Office Pool Picks
    • Prediction Accuracy
    • Rankings
    • Stats
    • Scores
    • Odds
    • Trends
    • Standings
    • Schedules
  • NCAAB
    • Expert Bracket Picks 2013
    • NCAA Tournament 2013
    • Betting Picks Grid
    • Game Winner Picks
    • Point Spread Picks
    • Over Under Picks
    • Prediction Accuracy
    • Conference Tournaments
    • Bracketology 2013
    • Season Projections
    • News & Analysis
    • Odds & Lines
    • Rankings
    • RPI Rankings
    • Strength Of Schedule
    • Stats
    • Trends
    • Teams
    • Players
    • Scores
    • Schedules
    • NCAAB Home
  • Blog
  • More Info
    • About Us
    • Help
    • Meet The Nerds
    • FAQ

Mailbag: Do Underdogs Have An Edge In College Football Rivalry Games?

  • 5 comments - College Football - posted by David Hess on October 26, 2012

We received a great question this morning from Andy Cox of Crashing The Dance.

Hey guys,

I’m curious (re: my Heels taking on N.C. State this weekend) whether you guys have done or are aware of any studies on the accuracy of point spreads in rivalry vs. “regular” games, particularly in college football. I’d take it on, but I don’t have the data.

There’s lots of Twitter chatter that the Heels as a 7.5 favorite is a bit high, especially considering the recent series history. Based on power rankings, the spread makes sense, but I’m curious how much the lines reflect the “intangibles” of rivalry games.

This made me curious, too, so I decided to dig into our historical data.

Defining Rivalries

We don’t have any “rivalry” labels in our database, so I had to improvise. I decided that grouping games by whether the two teams were A) from the same state, and B) from the same conference ought to do the trick. Obviously this will miss some rivalries (Michigan-Ohio State), but if there is a large effect, I would expect to see it in this data.

So, what did I find? Here is a table of ATS results, from the perspective of the underdog, for all games in our database involving two FBS or Division-I teams. The data goes back through 1995:

Underdog ATS Results In “Rivalry” Games, 1995-2012

StateConf# of GamesCover%ATS marginNote
diffdiff367451.5%+0.4
diffsame652450.0%-0.1
samediff65548.5%-0.9
samesame92053.4%+0.7"rivalry" group

Hmm, pretty interesting! We see that in games in our makeshift “rivalry” bin, the underdogs have beaten the spread over 53% of the time, often enough that it would have been profitable to blindly bet them.

However, here is the same table, but looking at only the last 10 years. The effect disappears:

Underdog ATS Results In “Rivalry” Games, 2003-2012

StateConf# of GamesCover%ATS marginNote
diffdiff216951.1%-0.3
diffsame426150.5%+0.0
samediff39247.8%-1.7
samesame57650.8%+0.1"rivalry" group

It looks to me like this piece of conventional wisdom actually started out as the truth, but is no longer accurate.

In other words, perhaps Vegas used to have a blind spot when it came to rivalry games, but it appears they’ve adjusted their rear view mirror.

 

  • adam

    lol.

  • Dan

    http://lmgtfy.com/?q=college+football+rivalries+wikipedia

  • http://www.teamrankings.com/ David Hess

    Umm, thanks?

    I didn’t use [same state] + [same conference] as the “rivalry” criteria because I don’t know how to find a list of rivalries. I did it because this was a quick 5 minute look at the issue, and I didn’t have time to label all the games by hand.

    That, and rivalries are subjective by their very nature, so there is no official list anywhere.

    P.S. I’d have gone with this rather than Googling for the word Wikipedia. :)
    http://lmwtfy.de/index.html?q=college+football+rivalries

  • http://www.teamrankings.com/ David Hess

    Here’s another analysis of this same topic, this one using the Wikipedia list you linked to: http://harvardsportsanalysis.wordpress.com/2012/11/19/please-do-not-throw-out-the-record-books/#more-3591

    They came to the same basic conclusion — underdogs don’t do especially well.

  • http://www.teamrankings.com/ David Hess

    UPDATE: The Harvard Sports Analysis Collective took a look at this same topic, from a slightly different perspective. They came to a similar conclusion — underdogs to not really do much different that usual in rivalry games. Definitely worth checking out:

    http://harvardsportsanalysis.wordpress.com/2012/11/19/please-do-not-throw-out-the-record-books/#more-3591

Like this blog? Subscribe!

Get new posts delivered automatically to your email address!

Or Follow Via: RSS Twitter

About Us

  • Meet the Nerds
  • Contact Us

Categories

  • > Press
  • > Site Help
  • > Site Updates
  • > Stat Geek Idol
  • College Football
  • College Football Bowls
  • College Football Pick'ems
  • MLB
  • NBA
  • NCAA Basketball
  • NCAA Tournament
  • NFL
  • NFL Pick'ems
  • NFL Survivor Pools
  • NHL
  • Soccer
  • Tennis
  • Women's Basketball
  • NBA Basketball
  • NBA Basketball
  • Playoffs
  • Game Predictions
  • Betting Picks
  • Odds
  • Rankings
  • Stats
  • Schedules
  • Teams
  • NCAA College Basketball
  • NCAA College Basketball
  • NCAA Tournament
  • Conference Brackets
  • Game Predictions
  • Betting Picks
  • Odds
  • Rankings
  • Stats
  • Schedules
  • Teams
  • 2013 NCAA Tournament
  • 2013 Bracket Picks
  • 2013 Bracket Odds
  • NCAA Upset Picks
  • Point Spread Picks
  • Over Under Picks
  • NCAA Tournament Matchups
  • Game Winner Picks
  • Team Prediction Grids
  • NCAA Player Projections
  • NCAA Blank Printable Brackets
  • March Madness Brackets
  • March Madness Predictions & Picks
  • 2013 NCAA Tournament Predictions & Picks
  • 2013 Conference Brackets
  • 2013 SEC Bracket
  • 2013 Big 12 Bracket
  • 2013 ACC Bracket
  • 2013 Big East Bracket
  • 2013 Pac 12 Bracket
  • 2013 Big 10 Bracket
  • All 2013 Conference Brackets
  • MLB Baseball
  • MLB Baseball
  • Game Predictions
  • Betting Picks
  • Odds
  • Rankings
  • Stats
  • Schedules
  • Teams
  • NCAA College Football
  • NCAA College Football
  • Predictions
  • ATS Picks
  • Office Pool Picks
  • Pick'em Predictor
  • Prediction Accuracy
  • Odds
  • Matchups
  • Rankings
  • Stats
  • Schedules
  • Scores
  • Teams
  • NFL Football
  • NFL Football
  • Predictions
  • ATS Picks
  • Office Pool Picks
  • Survivor Pool Picks
  • Pick'em Predictor
  • Prediction Accuracy
  • Odds
  • Matchups
  • Rankings
  • Stats
  • Schedules
  • Scores
  • Teams
  • 2012-2013 College Bowls
  • 2012-2013 College Bowls
  • Bowl Pick'em Picks
  • Bowl Betting Picks
  • Bowl Spread Picks
  • Bowl Winner Predictions
  • Bowl Upset Picks
  • Bowl Odds & Lines
  • 2012-13 Bowl Schedule
  • BCS Title Game
© 2005-2013 Team Rankings, LLC | All Rights Reserved | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy
TeamRankings.com is not affiliated with the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA®) or March Madness Athletic Association, neither of which has supplied, reviewed, approved or endorsed the material on this site. TeamRankings.com is solely responsible for this site and the accuracy and completeness of the information herein. Trademarks used herein are property of their respective owners.