• Login
  • Subscribe Now For Picks
TeamRankings
Follow @teamrankings
  • Home
  • NBA Playoffs 2013
  • NBA
    • Home
    • NBA Forum
    • Game Predictions
    • Season Projections
    • Game Winner Picks
    • Point Spread Picks
    • Over/Under Picks
    • Prediction Accuracy
    • Rankings
    • Stats
    • Scores
    • Odds
    • Trends
    • Standings
    • Schedules
  • MLB
    • Home
    • MLB Forum
    • Game Predictions
    • Season Projections
    • Game Winner Picks
    • Money Line Picks
    • Over/Under Picks
    • Prediction Accuracy
    • Rankings
    • Stats
    • Scores
    • Odds
    • Trends
    • Standings
    • Schedules
  • NFL
    • Home
    • NFL Forum
    • Game Predictions
    • Season Projections
    • Game Winner Picks
    • Point Spread Picks
    • Over/Under Picks
    • Office Pool Picks
    • Prediction Accuracy
    • Rankings
    • Stats
    • Scores
    • Odds
    • Trends
    • Standings
    • Schedules
  • NCAAF
    • Home
    • NCAAF Forum
    • Game Predictions
    • Season Projections
    • Game Winner Picks
    • Point Spread Picks
    • Over/Under Picks
    • Office Pool Picks
    • Prediction Accuracy
    • Rankings
    • Stats
    • Scores
    • Odds
    • Trends
    • Standings
    • Schedules
  • NCAAB
    • Expert Bracket Picks 2013
    • NCAA Tournament 2013
    • Betting Picks Grid
    • Game Winner Picks
    • Point Spread Picks
    • Over Under Picks
    • Prediction Accuracy
    • Conference Tournaments
    • Bracketology 2013
    • Season Projections
    • News & Analysis
    • Odds & Lines
    • Rankings
    • RPI Rankings
    • Strength Of Schedule
    • Stats
    • Trends
    • Teams
    • Players
    • Scores
    • Schedules
    • NCAAB Home
  • Blog
  • More Info
    • About Us
    • Help
    • Meet The Nerds
    • FAQ

2012-13 College Football Preseason Projection Recap: No Sophomore Slump

  • 1 comments - College Football - posted by David Hess on January 8, 2013

Now that the 2012-13 college football bowl season has drawn to close, it’s time to take a look back at our preseason projections, and evaluate how we’ve done.

This is the second year we’ve simulated the entire season (minus bowl games) before it began. Last year, things went quite well, and our preseason value picks provided exactly what they were supposed to: value.

As with any new endeavor, it was hard to tell whether we’d been good, good and lucky, or just plain lucky.  But a closer inspection shows this season’s projections, while not perfect, were again an overall success:

  • Our team win total picks and our BCS conference and division winner value picks were both profitable
  • Our biggest disagreements with the public consensus were right twice as often as they were wrong
  • 7 of the 10 BCS bowl teams were in the top 20 of our 2012 preseason college football rankings, compared to only 4 in the top 20 of the preseason AP poll

Let’s check out the details.

How Did Our Highlighted Team Projections Do?

In our preseason 2012 college football rankings post and our 2012 conference record projections, we highlighted a few projections that seemed to go against the grain:

Notre Dame. (#13 in our preseason ratings, UNRANKED in the preseason AP) – I think we all know how this one turned out. The Irish were outmatched in the BCS title game, and it took a few lucky bounces (missed field goal by Pittsburgh, overtime against BYU, etc) to get them there, but they were clearly one of the better teams in the country. Here’s what we said about them in the preseason:  ”The Irish have been discounted by many this year, not appearing in the AP’s top 25.  We’re more optimistic about their talent, ranking them 13th among FBS teams. A rating that high means a few lucky bounces could put them in a BCS bowl.” This one is clearly a HIT.

Florida (#10 in our preseason ratings, #23 in the preseason AP) – The Gators finished #9 in the final AP poll, almost exactly where we slotted them in the preseason. Why did we like them? We said about the Gators: “They have a strong program history, poor 2011 turnover margin (read: bad luck which shouldn’t repeat itself), and loads of returning starters. Those three qualities have historically foreshadowed a team’s improvement, and we think it’ll continue with Florida.” That’s another big HIT.

The Big 12. The Big 12 placed six teams in our preseason top 25, and four in our top 8, plus seven of the ten toughest schedules belonged to Big 12 teams. But take a look at the final AP poll, and the highest ranked Big 12 team is Kansas State, at #12. Unfortunately, this one was a MISS.

Oregon. “Oregon Favored In the Pac-12 Over USC?!” The general consensus before the season started was that USC was the best team in the Pac-12, and possibly the nation. However, we projected the Ducks as the most likely Pac-12 champs, and rated them #3 in the country, ahead of USC. While neither team ended up winning the official Pac-12 title, Oregon finished ranked #2 in the nation, and was likely the conference’s best team. That’s a HIT.

Oklahoma. The preseason polls had Oklahoma #4, while we had them #1 by a hair over Alabama. The Sooners had a disappointing season, and finished ranked #15 in the final AP poll. Clearly this one was a MISS.

Wisconsin/Ohio State. Our claim here was that even though we only rated Wisconsin as the third best Big Ten team, Ohio State’s (and Penn State’s) postseason ban gave them a huge leg up in the race for the Big Ten championship, because their biggest threats in the Leaders division were out of the running. Well, we were right about Ohio State being the biggest threat to the Badgers, as the Buckeyes finished the year as the only undefeated BCS team. Penn State also snuck past the Badgers into second place in the division. Wisconsin finished only 4-4 in the regular season, yet parlayed that 0.500 record into a spot in the conference championship game, where they proceeded to absolutely destroy Nebraska, earning themselves a Rose Bowl berth. So this is a big HIT.

That’s 4 hits and 2 misses. Given that all of these predictions were our “wow, TR is really going out on a limb there” anti-consensus highlights, we’ll take that performance any day.

Regular Season Win Total Value Pick Performance

We posted two types of value picks in the preseason: regular season win totals and conference or division winners.

Our regular season win total picks went 12-13, but because many of our picks were on the less likely side of the line, with positive payout odds, at the then-prevailing lines the net profit from betting one unit on each pick ended up at +4.2 units, for an ROI of +17%.

Below is a table of all our win total picks, ranked by projected ROI.

TeamActual WinsTR PickProj. ROIResultNet Units
Ohio State12Under 8.5 (+288)120%loss (by 3.5)-1
Mississippi6Over 5.5 (+379)90%WIN (by 0.5)+3.79
Florida St10Under 9.5 (+242)84%loss (by 0.5)-1
Georgia11Under 9.5 (+152)78%loss (by 1.5)-1
Vanderbilt8Over 6.5 (+150)63%WIN (by 1.5)+1.50
South Carolina10Under 8.5 (+124)62%loss (by 1.5)-1
Wisconsin7Under 8.5 (+266)60%WIN (by 1.5)+2.66
Texas A&M10Over 7.5 (+158)57%WIN (by 2.5)+1.58
USC7Under 10.5 (+116)54%WIN (by 3.5)+1.16
Michigan St6Under 8.5 (+103)47%WIN (by 2.5)+1.03
Kentucky2Over 5.5 (+350)42%loss (by 3.5)-1
Texas8Under 8.5 (+190)40%WIN (by 0.5)+1.90
Virginia Tech6Under 9.5 (-125)37%WIN (by 3.5)+0.80
West Virginia7Under 8.5 (-111)37%WIN (by 1.5)+0.90
TCU7Over 8.5 (+153)33%loss (by 1.5)-1
Clemson10Under 8.5 (-101)31%loss (by 1.5)-1
Oregon11Under 10.5 (+119)28%loss (by 0.5)-1
Missouri5Over 7.5 (+146)22%loss (by 2.5)-1
Louisville10Under 9.5 (-309)18%loss (by 0.5)-1
Marshall5Over 6.5 (+249)14%loss (by 1.5)-1
Alabama11Under 10.5 (-118)12%loss (by 0.5)-1
Duke6Over 3.5 (-243)8%WIN (by 2.5)+0.41
Arkansas4Under 8.5 (-107)7%WIN (by 4.5)+0.93
Nebraska10Under 8.5 (+130)6%loss (by 1.5)-1
Auburn3Under 7.5 (-177)5%WIN (by 4.5)+0.56
Total42% proj. ROI12-13 (avg 0.3 wins in our favor)4.23 (17% ROI)

Conference And Division Champ Value Pick Performance

Our conference or division winners had a similarly positive outcome — or even better, depending on how you grade a few cases where we highlighted two bets for a team.

For some conference and division picks, it was clear one team had some value, and we highlighted both a conference line and a division line. In the table below, we’ve graded each of these as half a unit bet on each option:

TeamTo WinOddsBetResultNet
Georgia TechACC+15000.5loss-0.5
Georgia TechACC Coastal+3000.5WIN+1.5
Boston CollegeACC Atlantic+20001loss-1
ConnecticutBig East+30001loss-1
IllinoisBig Ten Leaders+5001loss-1
IowaBig Ten Legends+8001loss-1
Oklahoma StateBig 12+25001loss-1
StanfordPac-12 North+10000.5WIN+5
StanfordPac-12+20000.5WIN+10
UtahPac-12 South+8000.5loss-0.5
UtahPac-12+32000.5loss-0.5
AlabamaSEC Western+1501WIN+1.5
MissouriSEC Eastern+10001loss-1
Total*102.5-10.510.5 (+105% ROI)

Using that approach, our preseason conference and division picks had a net profit of +10.5 units on 10 units initially bet, for an ROI of 105%, meaning they would have doubled your money. That’s not as good as last year — when our college football conference and division value picks would have tripled your money — but we’ll take it.

If you just stuck to the more conservative option (a division bet) for each team, you’d have seen a +7.5 unit profit (+75% ROI). And if you went with the riskier option (a conference bet) for each, the results would have been +13.5 units (+135% ROI).

We’re happy with the results from this season, and are looking forward to improving our projections in the offseason. We hope you’ll be around this fall to follow along.

  • http://yepi10.info/ kizifriv

    With the results of Team Mississippi won I believe they can do better than that!

Like this blog? Subscribe!

Get new posts delivered automatically to your email address!

Or Follow Via: RSS Twitter

About Us

  • Meet the Nerds
  • Contact Us

Categories

  • > Press
  • > Site Help
  • > Site Updates
  • > Stat Geek Idol
  • College Football
  • College Football Bowls
  • College Football Pick'ems
  • MLB
  • NBA
  • NCAA Basketball
  • NCAA Tournament
  • NFL
  • NFL Pick'ems
  • NFL Survivor Pools
  • NHL
  • Soccer
  • Tennis
  • Women's Basketball
  • NBA Basketball
  • NBA Basketball
  • Playoffs
  • Game Predictions
  • Betting Picks
  • Odds
  • Rankings
  • Stats
  • Schedules
  • Teams
  • NCAA College Basketball
  • NCAA College Basketball
  • NCAA Tournament
  • Conference Brackets
  • Game Predictions
  • Betting Picks
  • Odds
  • Rankings
  • Stats
  • Schedules
  • Teams
  • 2013 NCAA Tournament
  • 2013 Bracket Picks
  • 2013 Bracket Odds
  • NCAA Upset Picks
  • Point Spread Picks
  • Over Under Picks
  • NCAA Tournament Matchups
  • Game Winner Picks
  • Team Prediction Grids
  • NCAA Player Projections
  • NCAA Blank Printable Brackets
  • March Madness Brackets
  • March Madness Predictions & Picks
  • 2013 NCAA Tournament Predictions & Picks
  • 2013 Conference Brackets
  • 2013 SEC Bracket
  • 2013 Big 12 Bracket
  • 2013 ACC Bracket
  • 2013 Big East Bracket
  • 2013 Pac 12 Bracket
  • 2013 Big 10 Bracket
  • All 2013 Conference Brackets
  • MLB Baseball
  • MLB Baseball
  • Game Predictions
  • Betting Picks
  • Odds
  • Rankings
  • Stats
  • Schedules
  • Teams
  • NCAA College Football
  • NCAA College Football
  • Predictions
  • ATS Picks
  • Office Pool Picks
  • Pick'em Predictor
  • Prediction Accuracy
  • Odds
  • Matchups
  • Rankings
  • Stats
  • Schedules
  • Scores
  • Teams
  • NFL Football
  • NFL Football
  • Predictions
  • ATS Picks
  • Office Pool Picks
  • Survivor Pool Picks
  • Pick'em Predictor
  • Prediction Accuracy
  • Odds
  • Matchups
  • Rankings
  • Stats
  • Schedules
  • Scores
  • Teams
  • 2012-2013 College Bowls
  • 2012-2013 College Bowls
  • Bowl Pick'em Picks
  • Bowl Betting Picks
  • Bowl Spread Picks
  • Bowl Winner Predictions
  • Bowl Upset Picks
  • Bowl Odds & Lines
  • 2012-13 Bowl Schedule
  • BCS Title Game
© 2005-2013 Team Rankings, LLC | All Rights Reserved | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy
TeamRankings.com is not affiliated with the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA®) or March Madness Athletic Association, neither of which has supplied, reviewed, approved or endorsed the material on this site. TeamRankings.com is solely responsible for this site and the accuracy and completeness of the information herein. Trademarks used herein are property of their respective owners.