The focus on Pittsburgh for much of this season has been their lack of quality wins. In short, Pitt had beaten the teams they were supposed to beat and lost to the teams they were supposed to lose to. If every team did that, college basketball would bore you to death.
Now with Pittsburgh’s 74-67 home loss to North Carolina State yesterday, the Panthers are on the bubble. According to our NCAA tournament bracketology projections, Pittsburgh entered yesterday’s game with an 82.7% chance of making the tourney. Those odds now have plummeted to just above a coin flip, at 56.1%.
Does Pitt deserve to make the NCAA tournament?
There’s no arguing that Pitt’s lack of quality wins makes them far from a lock to make the 2014 NCAA tournament. However, determining Pitt’s actual team quality isn’t quite so simple.
Although they didn’t beat any great teams in non-conference play, the Panthers were impressive. Pittsburgh finished non-conference play with 12 blowout wins and a one-point loss to Cincinnati at Madison Square Garden.
Is the Big 12 the best conference in NCAA basketball?
It’s always a challenge to determine the best overall conference in the country. Once conference play starts, for every conference win, another team in that conference is picking up a loss. Still, at some point in conference play this year i’it became trendy to say the Big 12 is the best conference in the country.
While Big Ten favorites like Wisconsin and Ohio State were getting off to extremely shaky starts in conference, the Big 12 was consistently producing high-entertainment televised games. Games like Iowa State knocking off Oklahoma State 98-97 in triple OT were awesome to watch, but viewer appeal alone doesn’t win basketball games.
The answer, of course, depends on how you define best conference.
Here’s a look at how some of yesterday’s games impacted the 2014 NCAA bracket prediction landscape:
Xavier builds bracket resume with victory over Creighton
Back in January, the Big East looked like a three team race. After going undefeated in December, Xavier opened Big East play at 5-1 — then preceded to drop five out of their next eight games, landing themselves a spot on the NCAA bracket bubble. Just last week, we gave Xavier a 43% chance to make the tournament.
However, Xavier delivered when needed, capping off an impressive week with a win against Doug McDermott and Creighton yesterday. Today, our 2014 bracketology projections not only have the Musketeers as nearly a lock to make the NCAA tournament (84.6%), but just under a 60% chance of getting an eight seed or better.
As we come down the stretch of the college basketball regular season, eight teams remain in the running for 1-seeds:
- Arizona, Florida, Wichita State, and Syracuse all appear in position to control their own destiny
- Wisconsin, Villanova, Kansas, and Creighton could still move up to the top line
Wisconsin’s Bracket Seed Projection: A Wild Ride
Today’s algorithmic bracketology projections currently give all eight of the teams listed above at least a 1 in 4 chance of landing a 1-seed this year. Arizona tops the list at 86%, while Creighton sits at the bottom right at 25%. These teams have all taken different roads to move into their current positions.
Here’s a look at how last night’s games impacted the 2014 bracket prediction landscape:
1. Arkansas breaks through on the road vs. Kentucky
There’s not a team in the country that doesn’t prefer playing at home, but Arkansas and Kentucky are both teams with unique home/road splits in recent years. Entering last night’s game, Kentucky was 38-2 in SEC home games under John Calipari. On the other hand, Arkansas entered just 4-20 in SEC road games under Mike Anderson.
Monday afternoon we published our initial 2013-2014 college basketball preseason ratings, which we finalized this morning after a few crowd-sourced adjustments (thanks, everyone!). We’ve now got full preseason projections for all teams, including:
- College Basketball Projected Conference Standings … projected conference records and full regular season records, plus win odds for both the conference regular season title and the postseason tournament
- Bracketology Projections … odds to make the NCAA tournament, plus projected seeding, and lots more details. (One of our faves is the Bracketology By Conference page.)
- NCAA Tournament Bracket Predictions … round by round advancement odds, including probability of a team making the Sweet 16, making the Final Four, or winning the championship
This is all data-driven, and automated, so it will update every day throughout the season.
NCAA hoops starts in 4 days, which means we’re in the final stages of setting up our college basketball section for the upcoming season. Rosters have been loaded on our test server, and we’re making some final checks and tweaks before releasing everything to the wild. So, we won’t have official record projections and conference standings predictions posted until tonight or tomorrow, but we’ve got our preseason ratings prepped and ready to share.
These ratings are completely data-driven, with no manual fudges (except for the four new Division I teams, for whom we estimated ratings based on research into past results and current rosters). As with last year, the main inputs to our system are past team ratings, current rosters, player stats from the past few seasons, and recruiting info.
Now that the 2013 NCAA tournament has concluded in thrilling fashion, let’s review how our algorithmic NCAA tournament betting picks and computer-optimized brackets did this year.
In short, our betting picks were profitable and once again, our brackets did very well. Our bracket for small pools finished among the top 5-7% of the nation, our upset bonus brackets did phenomenally well in early round games, and many BracketBrains subscribers won prizes in their pools, including customer reports of first place finishes in contests as big as 500 people.
Finally, one of our larger pool brackets finished in the 99.99th percentile on ESPN.
First, we asked the amateur stat geeks of the world to submit us up to four pages of insightful, unique analysis about college hoops. (Here’s the invite.) We staked a $2,000 cash prize for the entry that exhibited the best combination of a compelling topic, rigorous analysis, and refined, persuasive presentation. The entries we received came from people of all backgrounds, from students to professors to professionals.
Then, we whittled the number of submissions down to five finalists, which we sent to an esteemed judging panel stocked with consumers and practitioners of basketball analytics. In the end, eight judges read every finalist’s entry, and weighed in with their rankings and feedback: Mark Cuban, Dean Oliver, Ken Pomeroy, John Gasaway, Ben Alamar, Toby Moskowitz, John Stasko, and Jeff Haley. For judge bios, see the original post.
Now, the judges have spoken, and we are happy to crown our champion of Stat Geek Idol 2: Jordan Sperber.
This post is one of the five finalists in our second Stat Geek Idol contest. It was conceived of and written by Stephen Shea.
In 2006-07, the champion Florida Gators employed a balanced offensive attack, with five players averaging between 10.3 and 13.3 points per game. In contrast, the 2010-11 UConn Huskies relied heavily on the shots of Kemba Walker. The amount of balance in an offense can vary greatly between teams, and the game has seen champions at both ends of the spectrum. We quantify offensive balance (OB). We observe a surprisingly high correlation between OB and rank among the AP’s top 25 teams.